Jump to content

User talk:Sexperson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Christ myth theory. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GABgab 22:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weird, I thought Isambard Kingdom was the one breaking this policy by reverting to HIS preferred version of the page instead of discussing and trying to solve the problem. Also, I was the one questioning the content, therefore, MY preferred version of the page should be the one being displayed. Oh well, works for me.Sexperson 22:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Sock?

[edit]

Are you Gonzales John? Just wondering, Isambard Kingdom (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

.........Sexperson 02:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 18:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]